The European Movement UK (EMUK) is consolidating its presence through formal collaboration with like-minded organisations. We now have an official partnership with Scientists for EU, Healthier IN the EU, and an affiliation agreement with Britain for Europe.
We are at a time when opposition to plans to exit the European Union is becoming more organised. Theresa May lost any mandate she thought she had for a hard Brexit after the General Election and now more and more people are uniting behind the belief that leaving the EU is a disastrous mistake and we need to steer the UK away from the cliff edge...
Read on: Collaboration Helps Consolidate European Movement UK - European Movement
Showing posts with label European Movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Movement. Show all posts
Monday, 14 August 2017
Saturday, 22 April 2017
The Convention - "Brexit and the Political Crash" 12 & 13 May, 2017
This email just arrived and may be of interest to people in and around London.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Wednesday, 29 March 2017
Brexit is bad for Britain - Stephen Dorrell
Brexit is bad for Britain
Today the Prime Minister has formally begun our withdrawal from the European Union in triggering Article 50.
Theresa May says that the referendum result means we should all come together and collude in a pretence that Brexit is good for Britain.
I profoundly disagree.
Too often I hear an argument which begins “The referendum result must be accepted; I regret the outcome, but we have to make the best of it”.
That is not a sound basis for policy in a representative democracy. It is what we normally call “trimming”. “Telling the voters what they want to hear”. “Putting convenience before principle”.
It is obviously right that those who lose elections lose power. That is what happened last year. But it doesn’t follow that those who lose power must change their minds.
I was a member of the Cabinet which lost power to Labour in 1997. Our parties disagreed on a number of issues, but after the result nobody expected me to declare that everything I’d fought for was a mistake, and I didn’t.
That is how representative democracy works. Those involved in public life seek support for their point of view and when they win, they have a mandate to follow through their policy for as long as they can sustain that support.
But those who disagree with them have not merely the right, but the obligation, to argue their case, not out of a misplaced commitment to consistency, but because our society benefits from noisy debate between those with different points of view.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)